Wednesday, June 27, 2007

CALL TO ACTION: (Nevada) Carson District Judge William Maddox calls offense 'natural impulse'

The Awareness Center, Inc.
(The Jewish Coalition Against Sexual Abuse/Assault)
P.O. Box 65273, Baltimore, MD 21209

CALL TO ACTION - Comments by Nevada's Carson District Judge Bill Maddox

Please join The Awareness Center, Inc. in expressing outrage over the detestable comments of Carson District judge Bill Maddox (article below). If comments such as his are permitted to stand without an outcry from the public survivors and victims to be are in grave danger. Judge Maddox's comments seem to be an attempt to normalize pedophilia which he indicates is only illegal because there is a law against it not because it is evil per se.

Please go to the website of the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline at to print out a complaint form. Please speak up, you do not have to be from Nevada to file a complaint. Let Judge Maddox and the Nevada Judiciary know that we are watching and that there must be disciplinary action as well as in depth education of judges regarding sex crimes.

Carson District judge calls offense 'natural impulse'
by F.T. Norton
Neveada Appeal - March 28, 2007
A Carson City man was sentenced to up to 18 years in prison on Tuesday for possessing more than 800 images of child pornography.

Jason Excell, 36, pleaded guilty to 10 counts of possession of child pornography. In exchange for the plea, additional charges were dismissed.

"These kinds of offenses are problems with impulse control," said Carson City District Judge Bill Maddox prior to sentencing. "When I say that, it's my understanding that most men are sexually attracted to young women. When I say young women I don't just mean women that ... you should be attracted to. I mean women from the time they're 1 all the way up until they're 100."

Maddox noted the legal terms malum in se, a Latin phrase meaning an act that is "inherently evil," and malum prohibitum, which means acts that are not necessarily inherently immoral or hurtful, only wrong by statute.

He said child pornography could be considered malum prohibitum because in some countries and cultures it is acceptable to engage in sexual conduct with young girls.

"As an example, having sex with a girl between 12 and 16 is prohibited because we say it's prohibited. It's because we decided as a civilized society you do not want adults engaging in sexual conduct with children below 16 years of age, which flies in the face of our, I guess for lack of a better description, our normal impulses," he said.

"I guess we could just ignore them, say it's just like a traffic ticket, it's malum prohibitum, it's only against the law because it's prohibited. Or we could say that because we're trying to control what's an otherwise natural impulse there has to be consequences.

"The bottom line on it all is the way we're going to control it in my opinion is to ensure that everybody understands what the consequences are if you engage in ... a lack of impulse control. It's likely that most people would find young girls sexually attractive. But we're civilized to the point that we're taught to control our impulses. When you don't, there has to be consequences."

In sentencing Excell, Maddox said he wanted to send a message to others in the community who might possess images of child porn.

"I want it to be clear to anybody out there that is thinking of downloading them or getting them on CD or ordering them through the mail or whatever, if you get caught possessing them you're going to go to prison in Carson City," he said.

Excell was arrested March 3, 2006, after his wife turned over photographs she found on his computer.

According to Deputy District Attorney Kristin Luis, the images are of children "easily under the age of 10," being sexually violated by adults or engaging in sex with other children.

She said at least 88 of the photographs were of children who have been identified by federal authorities through other child pornography cases nationwide.

Maddox could have sentenced Excell to between 10 and 60 years. Parole and probation suggested a sentence of two to 12 years. Maddox opted for an additional six years on Excell's sentence so that if he were paroled, he'd be under state supervision longer.

Excell is eligible for parole in two years. He was given credit for serving 391 days in jail.

click below for the entire transcript of senenceing of Jason Excell on child porn charges


Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm forwarding this to everyone I know. I think everyone else should too.

June 27, 2007 1:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a abuse of children. Does he not care about them?

What a disgrace for America and Nevada what is going on in that Sate?.

Please let not our voice be heard.

Speak up for the abused.

Someone needs to teach him about Humanity and lives of the victims who are human.

Help them.


June 27, 2007 7:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Impeach this Judge...

June 28, 2007 3:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can not belive this going on in Nevada. Can this Judge not say anything better than "nature impulse" something is wrong here "very wrong".

Remove him at once like today.


June 28, 2007 10:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Time to take action in Nevada. How can a Judge say such?

This is a great offense and a crime.

He needs off the seat for sure.

Remove his robe and impeach this man.


June 29, 2007 12:15 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home